Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200 F2.8E FL ED VR : 157,8 Sigma APO 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM : 138,3 Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM : 172,1 Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG APO Sony Alpha : 183,1 Sony 70-200mm f/2.8 G SSM II Lens : 172.1. So the new 70-200 is better than the old one and it focusses 300mm closer too.
The OP was comparing the 70-200 FL vs. the 70-200 S. There are three versions of the 70-200mm/f2.8 AF-S VR in the F-mount. I happen to have the first two, but the 3rd, most recent F-mount version has one fluorite element and is supposed to be the best among the three. That version is commonly referred to as the FL version:
Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G review (Mar 29, 2010) Nikon AF-S Nikkor 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II review (Feb 25, 2010) Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM review (Feb 1, 2010) Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS USM review (Nov 11, 2009) Panasonic Leica DG Macro-Elmarit 45mm F2.8 ASPH OIS review (Oct 20, 2009) Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH review (Sep 25, 2009
I've bought a Nikon 70-200 VR II yesterday. Wonderful! Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EF 70-200mm F2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Sony a7C II review
The 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II demonstrated lower CA levels at short focal lengths and much higher levels when zoomed in beyond 105mm. NIKON D810 + 70-200mm f/2.8 @ 200mm, ISO 800, 1/800, f/2.8. The good news is that you can easily address lateral chromatic aberration issues via post-processing software.
At $2600 this lens is about average for modern 70-200 2.8 lenses from Nikon, Sony, and Canon. It’s expensive, but if you can afford it it’s definitely worth the money. Competition: Given that this is the only native lens for Nikon’s mirrorless system, the 70-200 S is certainly the best lens for Z system shooters.
s2Zm. jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/252jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/45jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/207jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/43jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/384jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/234jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/174jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/124jnnc9f6x79.pages.dev/139
nikon 70 200 f2 8 vr ii review
